What’s wrong with networking today
Networking today is flawed.
Most events are flawed.
Most events are boring.
Most events are a waste of time.
Why?
Take for example an investor panel. You have 4 investors on a panel and 40 entrepreneurs in the audience. The panel lasts 2 hours, followed by Q&A, followed by every entrepreneur going over to every investor shaking his or her hand and asking for money. The investor usually says “sounds interesting” or “no” or “ok”, no real feedback is provided in those 20 second and often times the investors feels / looks annoyed being approached.
Let me go further.
The entrepreneur doesn’t give a shit what the panel has to say. He really doesn’t. He doesn’t want to hear about how you turned a $2MM investment into $100MM. He doesn’t want to hear how you fucked up investing in pets.com. (except maybe because then he may think you’re dumb enough to invest in his bad idea)
The entrepreneur wants to find out 3 things:
1) How can i get the investors attention?
2) How can i get a meeting with the investor?
3) How can I get the investors money?
Does the panel serve any of these purposes? No.
Now let’s look at what the investor wants…
1) Network with his peers
2) occassionally meet a smart entrepreneur to invest in
What he doesn’t want it a hoard of gold diggers looking for cash.
The standard panel networking format does not help anyone. It is a waste of time - though you can still meet people and I still go to them - i just disagree with them.
A VC friend of mine always says “Always appeal to the lowest common denominator” no one cares how fancy your tech is if its too complicated for them to use it.
So what’s the solution?
Now this is a shameless plug for my own investor networking events - however I DARE you to find anyone who has gone to one of them that doesn’t love it.
Have a quick speaker or two make a simple speech on a specific topic. Limit it to 5 minutes per speaker, 1-3 speakers max. Followed by Q&A. Cut out the panel discussion no one cares about.
Then let anyone get up and give their elevator pitch to the group for FEEDBACK. PROACTIVE feedback. Let anyone there chime in with advice, questions, comments etc…max of 5 minutes per person total. Then after, if any investor is interested he can approach the person who had the idea separately after.
This way the entrepreneur gets real and quality feedback and the potential to interest investors WITHOUT pitching them directly.
This also does another thing. It allows people to build relationships. Maybe the idea is bad but because it wasn’t a straight shoot down, real advice can be given and accepted without hard feelings. Nothing kills a conversation quicker between an entrepreneur and a VC than the words “i’ll pass”.
This way the open forum serves to quality people for one another and provide real feedback and advice. it also is stress free and pitch free networking and involves no bullshit hobnobbing.
just my 2 cents…























